From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Martin

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 28, 2015
2015 Ohio 239 (Ohio 2015)

Opinion

NO. 2014-2028

01-28-2015

State v. Martin


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 6 of the court of appeals' entry filed November 6, 2014:

"With respect to R.C. 2907.323(A)(1), which proscribes the creation or production of nudity-oriented material involving a minor, which definition of nudity applies: the statutory definition (R.C. 2907.01(H)), or the narrower definition set forth in State v. Young, 37 Ohio St.3d 249, 525 N.E.2d 1363, which requires additional elements of `lewd depiction' and `graphic focus on the genitals?'"

PFEIFER and O'DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Graves, 184 Ohio App.3d 39, 2009-Ohio-974, 919 N.E.2d 753.


Summaries of

State v. Martin

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 28, 2015
2015 Ohio 239 (Ohio 2015)
Case details for

State v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:State v. Martin

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 28, 2015

Citations

2015 Ohio 239 (Ohio 2015)
141 Ohio St. 3d 1452
23 N.E.3d 1194

Citing Cases

State v. Woodruff

As pointed out by the state, there is conflict among other appellate districts about whether the definition…

State v. Magnone

The issue currently before the Supreme Court is: "With respect to R.C. 2907.323(A)(1), which proscribes the…