From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lyle

Supreme Court of Washington.
Feb 19, 2016
365 P.3d 1263 (Wash. 2016)

Opinion

No. 92079–6.

02-19-2016

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Irving B. LYLE, Petitioner.


ORDER

¶ 1 This matter came before the Court on its February 11, 2016, En Banc Conference. The Court considered the Petition and the files herein. A majority of the Court voted in favor of the following result:

¶ 2 Now, therefore, it is hereby

¶ 3 ORDERED:

¶ 4 That the Petition for Review is granted only on the issue of legal financial obligations and the matter is remanded to the trial court in light of State v. Blazina, 182 Wash.2d 827, 344 P.3d 680(2015).

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

State v. Lyle

Supreme Court of Washington.
Feb 19, 2016
365 P.3d 1263 (Wash. 2016)
Case details for

State v. Lyle

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Irving B. LYLE, Petitioner.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Feb 19, 2016

Citations

365 P.3d 1263 (Wash. 2016)

Citing Cases

State v. Waller

The court in Blazina affirmed that a defendant must object to discretionary LFOs below to preserve the issue…

State v. Valdez

The Blazina court affirmed that a defendant must object to LFOs below to preserve the issue for appellate…