From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lapica-Falcon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 27, 1988
519 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 86-2613.

January 27, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Donald C. Evans, J.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


Appellant, State of Florida, appeals the trial court order that reduced appellee's sentence from five years in prison to three-and-one-half years in prison.

The state argues: (1) The trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on a motion to mitigate sentence; and (2) the trial court erred in departing downward from appellee's five-year sentence. We find reversible error in the first issue, making the second issue moot.

The trial court found appellee guilty of possession of cocaine, delivery of cocaine and conspiracy to traffic in cocaine on February 12, 1985. The court sentenced appellee to five years in prison on each charge to be served concurrently. This court affirmed appellee's judgment and sentence on appeal and the trial court received this court's mandate on July 18, 1986.

Under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800, a court may only correct or modify a legal sentence within sixty days of receiving an appellate court's mandate affirming the judgment or sentence. The trial court must act within that time. State v. Mancil, 354 So.2d 1258, 1259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); State v. Evans, 225 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).

Since the trial court here received this court's mandate on July 18, 1986, it had only until September 16, 1986, to rule on any motion to mitigate. The court did not do so until October 6, 1986, thus rendering its order reducing appellee's sentence to three-and-one-half years a nullity. See Mancil.

Because we have found the order reducing appellee's sentence to be a nullity, appellant's second point concerning the propriety of the downward departure is made moot.

We, therefore, remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to reinstate the original sentence.

HALL and FRANK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Lapica-Falcon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 27, 1988
519 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

State v. Lapica-Falcon

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. JOSE ANTONIO LAPICA-FALCON, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 27, 1988

Citations

519 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Dominguez v. State

We hold that the trial court correctly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to rule on this motion since…

Dixon v. State

An order declining to exercise discretion to reduce a legal sentence pursuant to Rule 3.800(b) is ordinarily…