From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Kennemore

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Mar 18, 1997
941 S.W.2d 764 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

No. 70235

OPINION FILED: March 18, 1997

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY, HONORABLE NANCY L. SCHNEIDER

Steven D. Miller, St. Louis, Brian E. Zink, St. Charles, for Defendant/Appellant.

Tim Braun, Prosecuting Attorney, Tanya Muhm Williams, Asst. Pros. Atty., St. Charles, for Plaintiff/Respondent.

Before Crane, P.J. and Smith and Pudlowski, JJ.



ORDER


Daniel Kennemore challenges the sufficiency of the state's evidence and a possible conflict of his defense attorney in his appeal of a class A misdemeanor in the third degree conviction. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Kennemore

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Mar 18, 1997
941 S.W.2d 764 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

State v. Kennemore

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. DANIEL KENNEMORE…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO

Date published: Mar 18, 1997

Citations

941 S.W.2d 764 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Kennemore v. Missouri, Dep't of Mental Health

(Docket No. 16). In the motion, he states that he just recently learned about the “opinion” in State of…