From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. KASH

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Nashville
Feb 23, 1998
C.C.A. No. 01C01-9705-CR-00179 (Tenn. Crim. App. Feb. 23, 1998)

Opinion

C.C.A. No. 01C01-9705-CR-00179.

February 23, 1998.

SMITH COUNTY, HON. J.O. BOND, JUDGE, (DUI THIRD OFFENSE).

APPEAL DISMISSED

FOR THE APPELLANT:

JACKY O. BELLAR, BELLAR BELLAR

FOR THE APPELLEE:

JOHN KNOX WALKUP, Attorney General Reporter, CLINTON J. MORGAN, Assistant Attorney General, TOM P. THOMPSON, JR., District Attorney General, H. DOUGLAS HALL, Assistant District Attorney General.


OPINION

After being convicted of DUI, third offense, and driving on a revoked license following a jury trial, the Defendant, Landy G. Kash, filed a Motion for New Trial on December 12, 1996. There is no order in the record either granting or denying that motion. There is a handwritten notation on the motion that it was overruled, but the judge's signature does not appear in the notation. However, for an order to be valid, it must be in writing and it must be entered in the court's minutes. See Evans v. Perkey, 647 S.W.2d 636, 641 (Tenn.App. 1982); Welch v. State, 553 S.W.2d 917, 919-20 (Tenn.Crim.App. 1977). The time for appeal runs from the entry of a proper order denying a new trial. Tenn. R. App. P. 4(c).

In Hutchison v. ARO Corp., 653 S.W.2d 738, 740 (Tenn.App. 1983), the court held that in the absence of a ruling on the motion for new trial, there has been no final disposition in the lower court, and that accordingly, there is no appeal as of right and the notice of appeal is of no effect. This Court's appellate jurisdiction is limited to review of the final judgments of trial courts, and therefore, we cannot entertain this appeal as we are without jurisdiction to do so. Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-5-108(a). The appeal is therefore dismissed.

________________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, Judge

CONCUR:

________________________________ DAVID H. WELLES, Judge

________________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, Judge


Summaries of

STATE v. KASH

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Nashville
Feb 23, 1998
C.C.A. No. 01C01-9705-CR-00179 (Tenn. Crim. App. Feb. 23, 1998)
Case details for

STATE v. KASH

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF TENNESSEE, Appellee, v. LANDY G. KASH, Appellant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Nashville

Date published: Feb 23, 1998

Citations

C.C.A. No. 01C01-9705-CR-00179 (Tenn. Crim. App. Feb. 23, 1998)

Citing Cases

State v. McDonnell

Until the trial court denies the motion for a new trial, the appellate court does not have jurisdiction over…

State v. McDaniel

In rendering its decision, the court in Foreman noted that in order for a denial of a motion for new trial to…