State v. Jackson

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Bernard Emmanuel Jackson, Appellant.

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 6, 2021

No. 2021-UP-345 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 6, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-345 Appellate Case 2019-001412

10-06-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Bernard Emmanuel Jackson, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted September 1, 2021

Appeal From Charleston County Bentley Price, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.