From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ingles

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1797
3 N.C. 4 (N.C. Super. 1797)

Opinion

(Fall Riding, 1797.)

1. The State cannot divide an offense, consisting of several trespasses, into as many indictments as there are acts of trespass that would separately support an indictment, and afterwards indict for an offense compounded of them all.

2. A former conviction for another offense of another denomination, grounded on the same facts as those now relied on, is a bar.

INDICTMENT for a riot with others, and for beating and imprisoning Edward D. Barry. The defendant pleaded that he had been heretofore indicted in the County Court of Edgecombe for an assault and (5) battery on the said Barry, and thereon had been convicted and fined, which indictment and conviction had been grounded on the same facts that this indictment was preferred for.

Baker for the State.

White for defendant.


The truth of this plea is admitted by the demurrer. The State cannot divide an offense consisting of several trespasses into as many indictments as there are acts of trespass that would separately support an indictment and afterwards indict for the offense compounded of them all — as, for instance, just to indict for an assault, then for a battery, then for imprisonment, then for a riot, then for a mayhem, etc. But upon an indictment for any of these offenses the Court will inquire into the concomitant facts, and receive information thereof, by way of aggravating the fine or punishment, and will proportion the same to the nature of the offense as enhanced by all these circumstances; and no indictment will afterwards lie for any of these separate facts done at the same time. This plea is a good one, and must be allowed.

The plea was allowed and the defendant discharged.

NOTE. — A person may be indicted for an assault committed in view of the court though previously fined for the contempt. S. v. Yancy, 4 N.C. 133, 519. An indictment pending on the county court may be pleaded in abatement to one in the Superior Court for the same cause. S. v. Yarborough, 8 N.C. 78. If a bill be merely found in the Superior Court, and before the party is taken he is indicted and convicted in the county court, he may plead the former conviction to the bill in the Superior Court. S. v. Tisdale, 19 N.C. 159.

Cited: S. v. Lindsay, 61 N.C. 470; S. v. Cross, 101 N.C. 779.


Summaries of

State v. Ingles

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1797
3 N.C. 4 (N.C. Super. 1797)
Case details for

State v. Ingles

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. INGLES

Court:Superior Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1797

Citations

3 N.C. 4 (N.C. Super. 1797)

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

MACAY, TAYLOR, and LOCKE, JJ., concurred with HALL, J., in opinion that there was no such record of a former…