From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hurt

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 18, 2014
367 N.C. 807 (N.C. 2014)

Opinion

No. 505PA10–2.

12-18-2014

STATE of North Carolina, v. David Franklin HURT.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina. Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hurt, David Franklin. James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.


Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hurt, David Franklin.

James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of August 2014 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of December 2014.”

HUNTER, J. and BEASLEY, J. recused.


Summaries of

State v. Hurt

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 18, 2014
367 N.C. 807 (N.C. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Hurt

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina, v. David Franklin HURT.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Dec 18, 2014

Citations

367 N.C. 807 (N.C. 2014)
766 S.E.2d 679

Citing Cases

State v. Stimson

"A motion to quash a subpoena is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and is not subject to…

In re A.H.

The trial court's evidentiary decisions, including a decision granting a motion to quash a subpoena on…