From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Humphrey

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 30, 2011
2011 Ohio 1426 (Ohio 2011)

Opinion

No. 2011-0054.

Submitted March 1, 2011.

Decided March 30, 2011.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ross County, No. 10CA3150, 2010-Ohio-5950.

Michael M. Ater, Ross County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard W. Clagg, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Craig M. Jaquith, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.


{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant's second assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would not accept the discretionary appeal.


Summaries of

State v. Humphrey

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 30, 2011
2011 Ohio 1426 (Ohio 2011)
Case details for

State v. Humphrey

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HUMPHREY, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 30, 2011

Citations

2011 Ohio 1426 (Ohio 2011)
2011 Ohio 1426

Citing Cases

State v. Smith

"To support a determination that a confession was coerced, the evidence must establish that: (1) the police…

State v. Sheets

{¶48} Further, in order for a court to determine that a confession was coerced, the record must contain…