From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Holt

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Dec 14, 1988
534 So. 2d 1007 (La. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. CR88-415.

December 14, 1988.

APPEAL FROM THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF NATCHITOCHES, JOHN B. WHITAKER, DISTRICT JUDGE, PRESIDING.

C.R. Whitehead, III, Billy J. Harrington, Harrington Harrington, Natchitoches, for defendants-appellants.

Michael Henry, Dist. Atty., Natchitoches, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GUIDRY, FORET and KNOLL, JJ.


On January 25, 1988, the defendants, Jimmy Holt and Thomas McGlothin, pleaded guilty to the crime of cultivation of marijuana, a violation of La.R.S. 40:966 A. On February 26, 1988, pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, the defendants were each sentenced to serve a five year term of imprisonment. They appeal alleging only that their sentences are excessive.

It is well settled that a defendant who agrees to a particular sentence in a plea bargain agreement may not subsequently appeal his sentence as being excessive. State v. Prejean, 520 So.2d 1070 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1987), and cases cited therein.

The defendants were aware of, and agreed to, the sentences imposed and cannot now complain that their sentences are excessive.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Holt

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Dec 14, 1988
534 So. 2d 1007 (La. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

State v. Holt

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JIMMY HOLT AND THOMAS McGLOTHIN

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Dec 14, 1988

Citations

534 So. 2d 1007 (La. Ct. App. 1988)