State v. Holmes

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Tequan Martrell Holmes, Appellant.

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

No. 2021-UP-407 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 17, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-407 Appellate Case 2019-001313

11-17-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Tequan Martrell Holmes, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, and Tequan Martrell Holmes, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted November 1, 2021

Appeal From Aiken County Thomas W. Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, and Tequan Martrell Holmes, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.