From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hockett

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 26, 1999
735 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

Nos. 98-02826, 98-03657

Opinion filed May 26, 1999

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County, Peter A. Dubensky, Judge.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

Gregory M. Wilson, Orlando, for Appellee.


We affirm the trial court's decision to dismiss the informations in these two interrelated cases because the State failed to allege an intent to defraud as an element of the offense described in section 319.33(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1997). See State v. Copher, 395 So.2d 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). The trial court's oral ruling allowed the State ten days to amend these informations, but the written order omitted this option. On remand, it is not necessary that the State have ten days within which to amend the informations. The State may amend at any time unless prevented by the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy, the doctrine of res judicata, a statute of limitations, or the dismissal of the first case with prejudice. See State v. Bacon, 385 So.2d 1160 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).

Affirmed with instructions.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and GREEN and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

State v. Hockett

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 26, 1999
735 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

State v. Hockett

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. KEITH HOCKETT, Appellee. STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 26, 1999

Citations

735 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)