From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hill

Supreme Court of Washington.
Apr 3, 2019
193 Wash. 2d 1002 (Wash. 2019)

Opinion

No. 96750-4

04-03-2019

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Frederick Kenneth HILL III, Petitioner.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its April 2, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is granted on the DNA collection fee issue only. In light of this Court's decision in State of Washington v. David Angel Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732, 426 P.3d 714 (2018), and the 2018 amendment to the legal financial obligations statutes, this case is remanded to the trial court to reconsider the imposition of the requirement to pay the DNA fee.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

State v. Hill

Supreme Court of Washington.
Apr 3, 2019
193 Wash. 2d 1002 (Wash. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Frederick Kenneth HILL III, Petitioner.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Apr 3, 2019

Citations

193 Wash. 2d 1002 (Wash. 2019)
438 P.3d 115