From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Higgins

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1984
314 S.E.2d 550 (N.C. 1984)

Opinion

No. 58A84

Filed 30 April 1984

APPEAL by the State pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 7A-30(2) from the decision of the Court of Appeals, Judge Wells with Judge Webb concurring and Judge Whichard dissenting, reported in 66 N.C. App. 1, 310 S.E.2d 644 (1984), which granted the defendant a new trial. The defendant had appealed from the judgment of Brannon, J., entered at the 16 December 1982 Session of CUMBERLAND County Superior Court.

Attorney General Rufus L. Edmisten, by Special Deputy Attorney General Charles J. Murray and Associate Attorney Floyd M. Lewis, for the State.

Van Camp, Gill Crumpler, P.A., by James R. Van Camp, for the defendant.


Defendant was convicted of felonious breaking or entering, felonious larceny, and assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury. At trial the State introduced into evidence, over defendant's objection, certain pawnshop tickets signed by the defendant. The Court of Appeals correctly determined that this evidence was not admissible for the purpose of establishing a motive for the crimes with which defendant was charged and further, that the State improperly used this evidence to impeach collaterally defendant's responses to the State's questions on cross-examination. The Court of Appeals' decision to grant a new trial is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Higgins

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1984
314 S.E.2d 550 (N.C. 1984)
Case details for

State v. Higgins

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOSEPH P. HIGGINS, JR

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 1, 1984

Citations

314 S.E.2d 550 (N.C. 1984)
314 S.E.2d 550

Citing Cases

State v. Spinks

The evidence in the case sub judice was admitted for the limited purpose of showing that the defendant needed…