From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Henry

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 22, 1937
188 A. 918 (N.J. 1937)

Opinion

Submitted October 30, 1936 —

Decided January 22, 1937.

On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 13 N.J. Mis. R. 536, sub nom. State v. Loog.

For the defendant in error, T. Raymond Bazley.

For the plaintiffs in error. Lester C. Leonard.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, CASE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Henry

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 22, 1937
188 A. 918 (N.J. 1937)
Case details for

State v. Henry

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. SIDNEY L. HENRY ET AL.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 22, 1937

Citations

188 A. 918 (N.J. 1937)
188 A. 918

Citing Cases

State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

The rule is followed in State v. Loog, 13 N.J. Misc. 536 ( Sup. Ct. 1935), where it is held unless negative…

State v. O'Brien

State v. Loog, 13 N.J. Mis. R. 536; affirmed, sub nom. State v. Henry, 117 N.J.L. 442; State v. Continental…