From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hamad

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1989
325 N.C. 544 (N.C. 1989)

Opinion

No. 35A89

Filed 9 November 1989

APPEAL of right by the State pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-30 (2) and on discretionary review of a decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 92 N.C. App. 282, 374 S.E.2d 410 (1988), granting a new trial to the defendant Hamad and a new sentencing hearing to the defendant Wells. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 October 1989.

Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by John F. Maddrey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State, appellant and appellee.

Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Appellate Defender, by Gordon Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant Donald Clay Wells, appellant and appellee.

A. Wayne Harrison and James M. Roberts for defendant Hatem Hamad, appellant and appellee.


Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Hamad

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1989
325 N.C. 544 (N.C. 1989)
Case details for

State v. Hamad

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HATEM HAMAD AND DONALD CLAY WELLS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1989

Citations

325 N.C. 544 (N.C. 1989)
385 S.E.2d 144

Citing Cases

State v. Robinson

N.C.G.S. § 90-95(h)(5) (2021) (emphases added). The ability to make a downward departure from the otherwise…

State v. Rhom

"[W]hether a trial court finds that a criminal defendant's ‘aid’ amounts to ‘substantial assistance’ is…