Opinion
Submitted October 25, 1935 —
Decided January 31, 1936.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 113 N.J.L. 349.
For the defendant in error, Erwin E. Marshall and Leo J. Rogers.
For the plaintiff in error, Meyer M. Semel.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmeed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.