finding a judgment ordering a father to pay child support effective "at the time the [mother] moves out of home owned by [father]" was not a valid, final judgment because it was based on a contingency
Summary of this case from Joseph v. WassermanNo. 2005 CW 2459.
November 3, 2006.
Appeal from the St. Tammany.
Louisiana Decisions without Published Opinions. Writ Granted and Made Peremptory; Matter Remanded for Further Proceedings.
finding a judgment ordering a father to pay child support effective "at the time the [mother] moves out of home owned by [father]" was not a valid, final judgment because it was based on a contingency
Summary of this case from Joseph v. Wassermanfinding a judgment ordering a father to pay child support effective "at the time the [mother] moves out of home owned by [father]" was not a valid, final judgment because it was based on a contingency
Summary of this case from Barfield v. Tammany Holding Co.In Fumar, the trial court's judgment ordered the defendant to pay "child support in the amount of $600.00... per month... effective at the time the custodial parent moves out of the home owned by defendant."
Summary of this case from D'Amico v. BurnthorneFull title:State v. Fumar
Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Date published: Nov 3, 2006
A judgment that is contingent on the occurrence of a future event is indeterminate and not a valid, final,…
D'Amico v. BurnthorneMr. D'Amico cites several cases to support his position that the consent judgment is invalid because it is…