From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Fuentes

Supreme Court of Arizona
Jun 24, 1976
551 P.2d 554 (Ariz. 1976)

Summary

In State v. Fuentes, 113 Ariz. 285, 551 P.2d 554 (1976), affirming 26 Ariz. App. 444, 549 P.2d 224 (1976), we noted that probationary jail time is not legally synonymous with other presentence incarceration.

Summary of this case from State v. Rodriguez

Opinion

No. 3540-PR.

June 24, 1976.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Maricopa County, Cause No. CR-79418; Howard V. Peterson, Judge.

Bruce E. Babbitt, Atty. Gen., by Shirley H. Frondorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, and Raymond Aaron Kizer, Certified Third Year Law Student Under Rule 28(e), 17A A.R.S., Rules of the Supreme Court, for appellee.

Martin, Feldhacker Friedl by William J. Friedl, Phoenix for appellant.


Petition for Review granted. The majority opinion of the Court of Appeals as reported in 26 Ariz. App. 444, 549 P.2d 224 (1976) is approved and adopted as the opinion of this court.

STRUCKMEYER, V.C.J., and HAYS, HOLOHAN and GORDON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Fuentes

Supreme Court of Arizona
Jun 24, 1976
551 P.2d 554 (Ariz. 1976)

In State v. Fuentes, 113 Ariz. 285, 551 P.2d 554 (1976), affirming 26 Ariz. App. 444, 549 P.2d 224 (1976), we noted that probationary jail time is not legally synonymous with other presentence incarceration.

Summary of this case from State v. Rodriguez
Case details for

State v. Fuentes

Case Details

Full title:The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Ismael FUENTES, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Arizona

Date published: Jun 24, 1976

Citations

551 P.2d 554 (Ariz. 1976)
113 Ariz. 285

Citing Cases

State v. Wietholter

This court ruled that time spent in jail as a condition of probation was not entitled to be credited toward a…

State v. Rodriguez

The deletions do not in any way alter our rulings in those cases. In State v. Fuentes, 113 Ariz. 285, 551…