From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Francis

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 17, 2014
100 A.3d 401 (Conn. 2014)

Opinion

2014-09-17

STATE of Connecticut v. Ernest FRANCIS.

Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition. Christopher Duby, assigned counsel, in opposition.


Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition. Christopher Duby, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 148 Conn.App. 565, 86 A.3d 1059, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court improperly failed to follow a procedure similar to that set forth in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in denying the defendant's motion to correct an illegal sentence?” ESPINOSA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

State v. Francis

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 17, 2014
100 A.3d 401 (Conn. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Francis

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Ernest FRANCIS.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Sep 17, 2014

Citations

100 A.3d 401 (Conn. 2014)
314 Conn. 908

Citing Cases

State v. Francis

Finally, the state claims that any deficiency in the process surrounding the trial court's denial of the…

Francis v. Maldonado

The Connecticut Supreme Court has granted certification on the question whether the appellate court properly…