From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Fly

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division Two
Feb 14, 1949
217 S.W.2d 385 (Mo. 1949)

Opinion

No. 41166.

February 14, 1949.

CRIMINAL LAW: Rape: No Bill of Exceptions: Information and Verdict Sufficient. No bill of exceptions having been filed, the record proper is examined and no errors appear. The information was in proper form and a verdict finding defendant "guilty as charged in the information", without specifying the crime of rape, was sufficient.

Appeal from Stone Circuit Court. — Hon. Tom R. Moore, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Douglas Mahnkey for appellant.

J.E. Taylor, Attorney General, and Will F. Berry, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

(1) The information is in proper form and is sufficient to charge the crime of rape. Sec. 4393, R.S. 1939; State v. Trumbull, 182 S.W.2d 524; State v. Famber, 214 S.W.2d 40. (2) The verdict is sufficient. State v. Meininger, 290 S.W. 1007. (3) The record discloses that the appellant was awarded allocution and was sentenced in accordance with the verdict of the jury. Secs. 4102, 4103, R.S. 1939.


After one continuance and the refusal of another, the appellant was convicted by a jury of the felony of rape upon the body of a female child under the age of sixteen years, in violation of Sec. 4393, R.S. 1939, Mo. R.S.A. in the circuit court of Stone County, his punishment being assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of two years. His motion for new trial filed under Sec. 4125 was overruled, and he was granted allocution under Sec's 4102 and 4103. Thereafter, on the same day February 2, 1948, he appealed to this court, but has failed to perfect his appeal and file a bill of exceptions, as required by Laws Mo. 1941, p. 342, Sec. 4151, Mo. R.S.A.

Nevertheless, it is our duty to search the record proper for error, under Sec. 4150, R.S. 1939, Mo. R.S.A. We find the same to be in due form. In addition to the facts shown in the preceding paragraph, it should be stated that the information follows precedents, State v. Turmbull (Mo. Div. 2) 182 S.W.2d 524(1). Likewise, while the jury's verdict merely found the appellant "guilty as charged in the information" without specifying the crime of rape, that was sufficient under State v. Meininger (Mo. Div. 2) 290 S.W. 1007, 1009(6); State v. Elvins, 101 Mo. 243, 246(6), 13 S.W. 937, 938(4, 5).

Finding no error in the record proper, the judgment of conviction is affirmed. All concur.


Summaries of

State v. Fly

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division Two
Feb 14, 1949
217 S.W.2d 385 (Mo. 1949)
Case details for

State v. Fly

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. JOY FLY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Missouri, Division Two

Date published: Feb 14, 1949

Citations

217 S.W.2d 385 (Mo. 1949)
217 S.W.2d 385

Citing Cases

STATE v. REDD

V.A.M.S., Section 547.270; State v. Fly, 358 Mo. 838, 217 S.W.2d 385; State v. Crawford, Mo.Sup., 251 S.W.2d…

State v. Abbott

State v. Akers, Mo.Sup., 242 S.W. 660; State v. Millering, Mo.Sup., 111 S.W.2d 121; State v. Fly, 358 Mo.…