From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Fisk

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Feb 26, 1985
488 A.2d 156 (Me. 1985)

Opinion

Argued November 9, 1984.

Decided February 26, 1985.

Appeal from the Appeal from Superior Court, Cumberland County.

Paul Aranson, Dist. Atty., Laurence Gardner, Asst. Dist. Atty., David Beneman, Law Student Intern (orally), Portland, for plaintiff.

Greenberg Greenberg, Stanley Greenberg (orally), Portland, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, VIOLETTE, WATHEN and SCOLNIK, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Defendant Robert F. Fisk, Jr., appeals from a civil judgment of the District Court (Portland) finding a violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-C(2)(B)(Supp. 1984-1985)(operating under the influence).In State v. Freeman, 487 A.2d 1175 (Me. 1985), we declared the civil OUI law to be unconstitutional.

The entry is:

Judgment vacated.

Remanded to the Superior Court for entry of judgment as follows:

"Judgment of the District Court vacated; remanded to the District Court with directions to enter an order dismissing the civil proceeding under 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-C."

All concurring.


Summaries of

State v. Fisk

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Feb 26, 1985
488 A.2d 156 (Me. 1985)
Case details for

State v. Fisk

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Maine v. Robert F. FISK, Jr

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Feb 26, 1985

Citations

488 A.2d 156 (Me. 1985)

Citing Cases

State v. Mitchell

We disagree for two reasons. First, today's decision in State v. Reny, 511 A.2d 1066 (Me. 1986), establishes…