From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. F.G

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 16, 1994
638 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 1994)

Opinion

No. 83065.

June 16, 1994.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance, Third District Nos. 92-1440, 92-1451, 92-1687, 92-1688, 92-1739, 92-1741 and 93-113 (Dade County).

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Roberta G. Mandel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for petitioner.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Harvey J. Sepler, Asst. Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, for respondents.


We review State v. F.G., 630 So.2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), in which the court certified the following question of great public importance:

[W]hether a claimed procedural error leading up to the entry of a final disposition order in a juvenile delinquency case renders the disposition "illegal" for purposes of a State appeal under subparagraph 39.069(1)(b)(5), Florida Statutes (1991).
Id. at 583. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution.

The district court ruled that the state cannot appeal such an order, and we agree. We approve the decision under review and adopt the district court's opinion as our own.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. F.G

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 16, 1994
638 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 1994)
Case details for

State v. F.G

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. F.G., ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 16, 1994

Citations

638 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 1994)

Citing Cases

W.E. v. State

The original sanctions imposed by the court in the instant case are authorized by statute and are, therefore,…

Valencia v. State

It is clear that a claim of error leading up to the imposition of sentence does not render the sentence…