From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Fearon

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 4, 1970
56 N.J. 61 (N.J. 1970)

Opinion

Argued April 20, 1970 —

Decided May 4, 1970.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Nathan Blumberg argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Abel Goldstein argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. James A. Tumulty, Jr., Prosecutor of Hudson County, attorney).

Mr. Remo M. Croce, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General, amicus curiae; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel.


The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division, 110 N.J. Super. 131.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For affirmance — None.


Summaries of

State v. Fearon

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 4, 1970
56 N.J. 61 (N.J. 1970)
Case details for

State v. Fearon

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM A. FEARON…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 4, 1970

Citations

56 N.J. 61 (N.J. 1970)
264 A.2d 446

Citing Cases

State v. Taveras

Defendant argues that the State did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was operating his motor…

State v. Sorrentino

"[T]he State's burden of proof unquestionably is beyond a reasonable doubt." State v. Bealor, 187 N.J. 574,…