From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Espinoza

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 24, 1995
455 S.E.2d 857 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

A93A1897.

DECIDED APRIL 24, 1995.

Motion to suppress. Cobb Superior Court. Before Judge Bodiford, pro hac vice.

Thomas J. Charron, District Attorney, Debra H. Bernes, Nancy I. Jordan, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellant. Steve T. Woodman, for appellee.


In State v. Espinoza, 212 Ga. App. 814 ( 442 S.E.2d 911) (1994), a majority of this court reversed the trial court's grant of Lorenzo Espinoza's motion to suppress. That judgment was reversed by the Supreme Court "on the ground that police officers discovered the evidence within the curtilage of the defendant's apartment for which they did not have a search warrant." Espinoza v. State, 265 Ga. 171 ( 454 S.E.2d 765) (1995). Accordingly, this court's original judgment is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is hereby made the judgment of this court.

Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J., Birdsong, P. J., Pope, P. J., Andrews, Johnson, Blackburn, Smith and Ruffin, JJ., concur.

DECIDED APRIL 24, 1995.


Summaries of

State v. Espinoza

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 24, 1995
455 S.E.2d 857 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

State v. Espinoza

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE v. ESPINOZA

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 24, 1995

Citations

455 S.E.2d 857 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995)
455 S.E.2d 857