In Eichem, a law enforcement officer arrested the defendant for DUI. According to the officer, the defendant stated that he would prefer a blood test but was informed that only a breath test was being offered.
Summary of this case from State v. HeinekenNo. 91,903.
November 4, 2005.
Appeal from Pottawatomie.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
In Eichem, a law enforcement officer arrested the defendant for DUI. According to the officer, the defendant stated that he would prefer a blood test but was informed that only a breath test was being offered.
Summary of this case from State v. HeinekenFull title:STATE v. EICHEM
Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas
Date published: Nov 4, 2005
Even so, a suspect's invocation of his or her statutory right to additional testing under K.S.A. 8-1004 must…