From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Edman

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 6, 2005
276 Conn. 906 (Conn. 2005)

Opinion

Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Hugh F. Keefe and Nancy Fitzpatrick Myers, in opposition.

Decided October 6, 2005.


The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn. App. 820 (AC 25033), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly hold that the issuing judge was not a `neutral and detached magistrate' under the fourth amendment to the United States constitution when he issued a search warrant for the defendant's home?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly remand this case to the trial court with direction to grant the motion to suppress without first holding a factual hearing?"

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17516.


Summaries of

State v. Edman

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 6, 2005
276 Conn. 906 (Conn. 2005)
Case details for

State v. Edman

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ERIC EDMAN

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Oct 6, 2005

Citations

276 Conn. 906 (Conn. 2005)

Citing Cases

State v. Edman

" and "2. Did the Appellate Court properly remand this case to the trial court with direction to grant the…