From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Echemeque

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 17, 1987
503 So. 2d 996 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-2354.

March 17, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Philip Bloom, J.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, for appellee.

Before DANIEL S. PEARSON, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for the purpose of allowing it to enter a written statement explaining its reasons for departing below the sentencing guidelines in sentencing the defendant. Our relinquishment having expired, and no written order having been entered, the defendant's sentence is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985). We remind the trial court that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(11) requires that "[a]ny sentence outside of the guidelines must be accompanied by a written statement delineating the reasons for the departure." We trust that should the trial court upon resentencing again depart from the guidelines, it will comply with the requirements of this rule.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Echemeque

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 17, 1987
503 So. 2d 996 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

State v. Echemeque

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. LAZARA ECHEMEQUE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 17, 1987

Citations

503 So. 2d 996 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

State v. Lemon

Furthermore, this court, as well as other courts, has stated that notations on a scoresheet do not constitute…

Johnson v. State

The state also confessed "error" on the separate ground that the lower court entered no separate written…