From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Downs

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 29, 1984
686 P.2d 1041 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

83-079CR; CA A29545

Argued and submitted March 28, 1984

Sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing August 29, 1984

Appeal from Circuit Court, Klamath County.

Ted Abram, Judge.

J. Marvin Kuhn, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, Joseph, Chief Judge, and Van Hoomissen, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing.


Defendant was sentenced to 20 years for manslaughter in the first degree and 10 years as a dangerous offender pursuant to ORS 161.725. The trial court ordered him to serve consecutive minimum terms of 10 years on the manslaughter conviction and 5 years as a dangerous offender. ORS 144.110. He appeals only from the sentence.

Defendant contends, and the state concedes, that the trial court erred in sentencing defendant for the crime and as a dangerous offender and in ordering him to serve two consecutive minimum terms. We accept the state's concession but decline its suggestion to modify the judgment. However, we agree that the trial court could properly have achieved the net sentence actually given — 30 years with a 15-year minimum — under ORS 161.725. The dangerous offender statute allows a sentence of up to 30 years, and a 15-year minimum term may be imposed pursuant to ORS 144.110.

Defendant argues that the trial court lacked authority to impose a minimum sentence after sentencing him as a dangerous offender and that minimum terms of imprisonment imposed pursuant to ORS 144.110(1) are violative of the Oregon and U.S. Constitutions, because they are disproportionate to the offense committed. Both arguments are without merit. State v. Holmes, 62 Or. App. 652, 661 P.2d 556, rev den 295 Or. 297 (1983); State v. Turner, 296 Or. 451, 455, 676 P.2d 873 (1984); State v. Macy, 295 Or. 738, 671 P.2d 92 (1983).

Sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Downs

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 29, 1984
686 P.2d 1041 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

State v. Downs

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RALPH EUGENE DOWNS, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 29, 1984

Citations

686 P.2d 1041 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)
686 P.2d 1041

Citing Cases

State v. Small

The state concedes, and we agree, that the court erred. State v. Downs, 69 Or. App. 556, 686 P.2d 1041…

State v. Lynes

The sentence exceeded the maximum allowable. We remand for resentencing. State v. Small, 101 Or. App. 448,…