From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Diamondstone

Supreme Court of Vermont
Feb 5, 1976
365 A.2d 536 (Vt. 1976)

Opinion

No. 9-74

February 5, 1976.

Appeal from District Court, Unit No. 6, Windham Circuit.


It being acknowledged by the State that expert testimony was improperly received, to the prejudice of the defendant, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

State v. Diamondstone

Supreme Court of Vermont
Feb 5, 1976
365 A.2d 536 (Vt. 1976)
Case details for

State v. Diamondstone

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Vermont v. Peter I. DIAMONDSTONE

Court:Supreme Court of Vermont

Date published: Feb 5, 1976

Citations

365 A.2d 536 (Vt. 1976)
134 Vt. 608

Citing Cases

State v. Debanville

Prejudicial error is manifest and the judgment must be reversed. State v. Diamondstone, 134 Vt. 608, 365 A.2d…