From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Denney

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Jun 15, 2016
885 N.W.2d 219 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Summary

recognizing the question left unanswered in Harrington but ultimately concluding the defendant suffered no prejudice as a result of the admission of the prior theft convictions

Summary of this case from Cobbins v. State

Opinion

No. 15–0318.

06-15-2016

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Travis Lee DENNEY, Defendant–Appellant.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Kevin R. Cmelik and Tyler J. Buller, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Denney

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Jun 15, 2016
885 N.W.2d 219 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

recognizing the question left unanswered in Harrington but ultimately concluding the defendant suffered no prejudice as a result of the admission of the prior theft convictions

Summary of this case from Cobbins v. State
Case details for

State v. Denney

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Travis Lee DENNEY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Jun 15, 2016

Citations

885 N.W.2d 219 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Cobbins v. State

We have addressed this issue many times in the intervening six years. See Cobbins, 2013 WL 6405461, at *8;…