From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Denney

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec 9, 2014
450 S.W.3d 809 (W.D. Mo. 2014)

Opinion

WD 77225

12-09-2014

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Leilani Denney, Appellant.

Kate E. Noland, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Liberty, MO, Attorney for Respondent. Casey J. Symonds and Tyler J. Jansen, Lee's Summit, MO, Attorneys for Appellant.


Kate E. Noland, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Liberty, MO, Attorney for Respondent.

Casey J. Symonds and Tyler J. Jansen, Lee's Summit, MO, Attorneys for Appellant.

Before Division Three: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Cynthia L. Martin and Gary D. Witt, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Leilani Denney appeals, following a bench trial, her convictions of the class A misdemeanor of second-degree endangering the welfare of a child, the class B misdemeanor of second-degree property damage, and the class A misdemeanor of failure to proceed with caution when approaching a stationary emergency vehicle displaying emergency lights, for which she received a suspended execution of a combined two-year sentence in the county jail and two years' probation. Denney argues that the highway patrol troopers that initiated the traffic stop, which led to her arrest and charges, lacked both reasonable suspicion to initiate the stop and probable cause to place her under arrest. But because the record amply demonstrates that the troopers had both reasonable suspicion and probable cause, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Denney

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec 9, 2014
450 S.W.3d 809 (W.D. Mo. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Denney

Case Details

Full title:State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Leilani Denney, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Dec 9, 2014

Citations

450 S.W.3d 809 (W.D. Mo. 2014)