From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cooper

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 24, 2004
889 So. 2d 119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Summary

In State v. Cooper, 889 So.2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), our court cited to Deleon generally as authority for our conclusion that the trial court's finding of an "isolated" incident was not supported by the record.

Summary of this case from State v. Fontaine

Opinion

No. 4D03-2803.

November 24, 2004.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael L. Gates, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02-4454 CF10A, 01-4131 CF10A, 02-2813 CF10A.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Terrence Moons, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


We reverse appellant's downward departure sentence, and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.

A mitigating factor which justifies a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines is, "the offense was committed in an unsophisticated manner and was an isolated incident for which the defendant has shown remorse." § 921.0026(2)(j), Fla. Stat. (2003). To justify departure on this basis, all three elements must be articulated by the trial judge and supported by the record. See State v. Thompson, 844 So.2d 814, 815 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

In this case, the trial court articulated these factors as the basis for the departure sentence; however, the record does not support the findings. Although there was some evidence that appellant had shown remorse, there was no evidence to show the manner in which the crime was committed. Moreover, the evidence clearly disputed the finding that this was an isolated event. See generally State v. Deleon, 867 So.2d 636, 637-38 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (holding that "where defendant's scoresheet reflected previous felonies and misdemeanors, his conduct could not have been characterized as isolated."). Thus, the trial court should have imposed a guidelines sentence.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Cooper

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 24, 2004
889 So. 2d 119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

In State v. Cooper, 889 So.2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), our court cited to Deleon generally as authority for our conclusion that the trial court's finding of an "isolated" incident was not supported by the record.

Summary of this case from State v. Fontaine
Case details for

State v. Cooper

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Mark COOPER, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 24, 2004

Citations

889 So. 2d 119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

State v. Fontaine

All three elements must be met before the trial court may depart under this factor. State v. Cooper, 889…

State v. Strawser

When the trial court relies solely on this mitigator, all three elements must be shown. State v. Cooper, 889…