Opinion
Submitted May 28, 1926 —
Decided October 18, 1926.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 63.
For the plaintiff in error, Romulus P. Rimo.
For the defendant in error, Francis L. Bergen.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, KALISH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.