Opinion
1999-1268.
October 13, 2004.
Richland C.P. No. 98-CR-171H.
On application for reopening under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6). Motion denied because the appellant failed to comply with the 90-day filing deadline in S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6)(A).
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
State v. Cassano
Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 13, 2004
816 N.E.2d 252 (Ohio 2004)
Summaries of
State v. Cassano
Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 13, 2004
816 N.E.2d 252 (Ohio 2004)
Case details for
State v. Cassano
Case Details
Full title:STATE v. CASSANO
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Oct 13, 2004
Citations
816 N.E.2d 252 (Ohio 2004)
816 N.E.2d 252
2004 Ohio 5405
Citing Cases
Ahmed v. Houk
This Court finds only two capital cases in which the Ohio Supreme Court enforced the timeliness requirement…