From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Carter

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Jan 12, 2018
No. 16-KP-1149 (La. Jan. 12, 2018)

Opinion

No. 16-KP-1149

01-12-2018

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ROBERT C. CARTER


ON SUPERVISORY WRIT TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons:

I agree with the Court's decision to deny the writ application in this post-conviction matter. I write separately to note the deficient performance of defense counsel, as I have previously observed. State v. Hickman, 2017-0142 (La. 9/29/17, 2), 227 So.3d 246, 247 (Crichton, J., concurring) (noting "defense counsel's writ application to this court lacked legal support and was riddled with typographical errors, amounting to nothing more than an unsupported, near incomprehensible court filing."). As this writ application is no different, I remain concerned about the quality of defense counsel's work in these important post-conviction matters.


Summaries of

State v. Carter

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Jan 12, 2018
No. 16-KP-1149 (La. Jan. 12, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Carter

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ROBERT C. CARTER

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jan 12, 2018

Citations

No. 16-KP-1149 (La. Jan. 12, 2018)