From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Carey

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 27, 2019
331 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2019)

Opinion

03-27-2019

STATE of Connecticut v. Alanna R. CAREY

Jennifer B. Smith, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Rocco A. Chiarenza, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 187 Conn.App. 438, 202 A.3d 1067 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the allegedly improper admission of Mark Manganello's hearsay testimony was harmless?"


Summaries of

State v. Carey

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 27, 2019
331 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Alanna R. CAREY

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Mar 27, 2019

Citations

331 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2019)
203 A.3d 1246

Citing Cases

State v. Carey

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: "Did the…