From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. CANO

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 2, 1988
529 So. 2d 762 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 88-294.

July 19, 1988. Rehearing Denied September 2, 1988.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Arthur Rothenberg, Judge.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Yvette Rhodes Prescott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

John H. Lipinski, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


The trial court's sentence outside of the guidelines is reversed because it is not accompanied by the required written statement delineating the reasons for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985); Vidal v. State, 516 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

STATE v. CANO

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 2, 1988
529 So. 2d 762 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

STATE v. CANO

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. FRANCISCO CANO, A/K/A PACO CANO…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 2, 1988

Citations

529 So. 2d 762 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)