From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Campusano

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 22, 2002
813 So. 2d 301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 3D02-1061.

April 22, 2002.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction — Prohibition.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Paulette R. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.

Robbins, Tunkey, Ross, Amsel, Waxman Eiglarsh, and Robert G. Amsel, Miami, for respondents.

Before JORGENSON, SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.


We grant the petition for writ of prohibition. The respondents commendably concede that the trial judge improperly reconsidered the disqualification order, and improperly attempted to refute the charges of partiality in the motion. Bundy v. Rudd, 366 So.2d 440 (Fla. 1978); State v. Schack, 617 So.2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Accordingly, we grant the petition, withholding the writ in reliance upon the trial court abiding by our decision. This cause is remanded with directions to the Chief Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit to reassign this case to another trial judge.

Prohibition granted.


Summaries of

State v. Campusano

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 22, 2002
813 So. 2d 301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

State v. Campusano

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. ARLENE CAMPUSANO AND HIRIAM AYALA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 22, 2002

Citations

813 So. 2d 301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)