From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Feb 22, 2017
898 N.W.2d 204 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

Summary

distinguishing between scope and duration tests

Summary of this case from State v. McFadden

Opinion

No. 15-1772

02-22-2017

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jordan CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant.

Dean A. Stowers of Stowers & Sarcone PLC, West Des Moines, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Jean C. Pettinger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Convictions Vacated and Remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Feb 22, 2017
898 N.W.2d 204 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

distinguishing between scope and duration tests

Summary of this case from State v. McFadden

explaining we should prefer legal rules capable of consistent application

Summary of this case from State v. Weitzel
Case details for

State v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jordan CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Feb 22, 2017

Citations

898 N.W.2d 204 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. Weitzel

Finally, we note the material-inducement standard is inconsistent with fundamental rule-of-law principles.…

State v. McFadden

Nonetheless, we explained "if the scope or authority of the officer is exceeded, the duration of the seizure…