From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Calvin

Supreme Court of Washington.
Aug 5, 2015
183 Wn. 2d 1013 (Wash. 2015)

Opinion

No. 89518–0.

2015-08-5

STATE of Washington, Respondent. v. Donald CALVIN, Petitioner.


ORDER

¶ 1 A Special Department of the court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Stephens, González, Gordon McCloud, and Yu, considered Donald Calvin's petition for review on August 4, 2014. The Department unanimously agreed that the superior court in imposing discretionary legal financial obligations on Mr. Calvin in connection with his criminal conviction did not adequately address Mr. Calvin's present and future ability to pay based on consideration of his financial resources and the nature of the burden that the payment of discretionary costs would impose, as required by RCW 10.01.160(3) and this court's decision in State of Washington v. Nicholas Peter Blazina, 182 Wash.2d 827, 344 P.3d 680 (2015). Pursuant to that decision, the superior court must conduct on the record an individualized inquiry into Mr. Calvin's current and future ability to pay in light of such nonexclusive factors as the circumstances of his incarceration and his other debts, including nondiscretionary legal financial obligations, and the factors for determining indigency status under GR 34. Accordingly,

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted only on the issue of imposition of discretionary legal financial obligations and the case is remanded to the Superior Court to reconsider the imposition of the discretionary legal financial obligations consistent with the requirements of State of Washington v. Nicholas Peter Blazina, 182 Wash.2d 827, 344 P.3d 680 (2015).

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

State v. Calvin

Supreme Court of Washington.
Aug 5, 2015
183 Wn. 2d 1013 (Wash. 2015)
Case details for

State v. Calvin

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Washington, Respondent. v. Donald CALVIN, Petitioner.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Aug 5, 2015

Citations

183 Wn. 2d 1013 (Wash. 2015)
183 Wash. 2d 1013
353 P.3d 640

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

We do not address these issues, either because the statement does not adequately inform us as to the nature…

State v. Villanueva

The law of the case doctrine applies to both elements instructions and definitional instructions. State v.…