From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Butler

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 27, 1998
719 So. 2d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-4028.

September 23, 1998. Rehearing Denied October 27, 1998.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Marc H. Gold, J.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rochelle L. Lewis, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jeffrey M. Harris, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


Defendant pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of robbery and was sentenced under the Florida Youthful Offender Statute (YOS). The trial court withheld adjudication, but sentenced him to 18 months in prison, followed by 1 year on probation. This appeal follows.

See § 958.04, Fla. Stat. (1997).

Both parties agree that the defendant was sentenced pursuant to section 958.04(2)(c), of the Youthful Offender Statute, which provides that:

"The court may impose a split sentence whereby the youthful offender is to be placed on probation or community control upon completion of any specified period of incarceration; however, if the incarceration period is to be served in a department facility other than a probation and restitution center or community residential facility, such period shall be for not less than 1 year or more than 4 years."

At the same time, section 958.04(2)(b) allows incarceration as a condition of probation or community control, as here, in a community or county facility or in a probation or restitution center, but limits the term of such incarceration to no more than 364 days.

In State v. Oates, 610 So.2d 522 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), the court held that a sentence functionally indistinguishable from the sentence in this case was improper and unauthorized by the statute under which it was imposed. There as here, the court imposed incarceration under the YOS as a condition of probation or community control, but imposed a stated term greater than 364 days. The court noted that adjudication may not be withheld when the defendant is incarcerated, unless the term of incarceration does not exceed 364 days. We agree with the reasoning of Oates and adopt it in this district.

We vacate Butler's sentence and remand with instructions that, upon adjudication of guilt, he may again be sentenced to incarceration or, alternatively, the court may decline to adjudicate him guilty and sentence him to a term of incarceration as a condition of probation so long as the incarcerative portion does not exceed 364 days.

REVERSED.

STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Butler

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 27, 1998
719 So. 2d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

State v. Butler

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Daniel BUTLER, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 27, 1998

Citations

719 So. 2d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

State v. D.S

This case concerns a commitment under section 985.228, Florida Statutes (1997) and is thus distinguishable…

State v. Dishman

We agree. See State v. Butler, 719 So.2d 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). We vacate Dishman's sentence and remand the…