From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Burkart

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc
Apr 11, 1977
548 S.W.2d 550 (Mo. 1977)

Opinion

No. 59896.

March 15, 1977. Rehearing Denied April 11, 1977.

Theodore A. Strecker, Springfield, for relator.

Ben K. Upp, Springfield, for respondent.


Relator, Allen Locke, is charged in the Circuit Court of Greene County with the capital murder of one Ronald Max Ray under the provisions of §§ 559.005 and 559.009, RSMo Supp. 1975. His motion to dismiss the information against him, based on the alleged unconstitutionality of said sections, was overruled by the trial court.

Thereafter, this court, upon the petition of relator, issued its provisional rule in prohibition; arguments were made; and, the cause was submitted.

The court now having concluded that prosecution may be had under § 559.005 with punishment as specified in § 559.011, for the reasons delineated in State of Missouri v. Duren, Mo., 547 S.W.2d 476 (No. 59763) handed down this date, our provisional rule herein should be quashed.

It is so ordered.

BARDGETT, HENLEY, FINCH, DONNELLY and RENDLEN, JJ., concur.

SEILER, C. J., concurs in part and dubitative in part in separate opinion filed.


This case being governed by State v. Duren, Mo., 547 S.W.2d 476, No. 59763, handed down this date, I take the same position in this case as I did there and adopt by reference the opinion I filed therein.


Summaries of

State v. Burkart

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc
Apr 11, 1977
548 S.W.2d 550 (Mo. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Burkart

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. ALLEN LOCKE, RELATOR, v. THE HONORABLE GLENN A. BURKART…

Court:Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc

Date published: Apr 11, 1977

Citations

548 S.W.2d 550 (Mo. 1977)

Citing Cases

Rogers v. State

However, the court also held that § 559.011 (RSMo Supp. 1975) "is a viable statute" and that prosecution may…