From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Burgess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 2007
44 A.D.3d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2003-00346.

October 16, 2007.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated September 6, 2005 ( People v Burgess, 21 AD3d 904), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 9, 2002.

Mickeal Burgess, Napanoch, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Spolzino, Krausman and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]).


Summaries of

State v. Burgess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 2007
44 A.D.3d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Burgess

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICKEAL BURGESS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 16, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7854
842 N.Y.S.2d 916