From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Budke

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jul 19, 1985
371 N.W.2d 533 (Minn. 1985)

Opinion

No. CX-84-211.

July 19, 1985.

Appeal from District Court, Otter Tail County; Paul G. Hoffman, Roger Klapkake and Bernard Boland, Judges.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Thomas J. Barrett, Sp. Asst., St. Paul, Waldemar D. Senyk, Asst. Otter Tail County Atty., Fergus Falls, for appellant.

John A. Eidsmoe, Tulas, Okla., Roger Oldenkamp, Fergus Falls, for Budkes.

Clyde F. Anderson, Council of Christian Home Educators, Minneapolis, John W. Whitehead, Manassas, Va., Wendell R. Bird, Richard W. Summers, Atlanta, Ga., amicus curiae.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.


Donald and Kathleen Budke were convicted of violating Minnesota's compulsory school attendance law. On appeal, a three-judge district court panel reversed their convictions based on its belief that the Budke's first amendment rights had been infringed.

We affirm the reversal of the Budkes' convictions for the reasons set forth in our opinion in State v. Newstrom, 371 N.W.2d 525 (Minn. 1985). We do not reach the first amendment issues raised in this appeal.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Budke

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jul 19, 1985
371 N.W.2d 533 (Minn. 1985)
Case details for

State v. Budke

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Minnesota, petitioner, Appellant, v. Donald BUDKE and Kathleen…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Jul 19, 1985

Citations

371 N.W.2d 533 (Minn. 1985)

Citing Cases

State v. Newstrom

Moreover, the statute affords no guidance to enforcement officials limiting their discretion in determining…