Opinion
2014-04-16
STATE of Connecticut v. Richard BRUNDAGE.
Raymond L. Durelli, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Kathryn W. Bare, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
Raymond L. Durelli, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Kathryn W. Bare, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 148 Conn.App. 550, 87 A.3d 582, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly construe its own rescript in State v. Brundage, 138 Conn.App. 22, 50 A.3d 396 (2012), and thereby properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining the defendant's objection to a substitute information filed by the state after remand?
“2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the doctrine of res judicata did not bar a retrial on the kidnapping charges?” ROBINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.