Summary
In Brott v. State, 97 N.W. 593, 70 Neb. 395, 63 L.R.A., 789; People v. Pfanschmidt, 104 N.E. 804, 260 Ill. 411, Ann. Cas., 1915A, 1171, and Ruse v. State, 115 N.E. 778, L.R.A., 9917E, 726, a contrary view is taken, and bloodhound evidence is held inadmissible.
Summary of this case from Copley v. StateOpinion
No. 15815-5-I.
September 9, 1985. UNREPORTED OPINION
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 83-1-00441-8, Terrence A. Carroll, J., entered September 27, 1983.
Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Webster, J., concurred in by Williams and Grosse, JJ.