From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brookwell

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Sep 25, 2024
335 Or. App. 270 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)

Opinion

A181049

09-25-2024

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NATALIE J. BROOKWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Marc D. Brown, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Emily N. Snook, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

Submitted August 29, 2024

Coos County Circuit Court 22CR49058, Richard L. Barron, Senior Judge.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Marc D. Brown, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Emily N. Snook, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, Egan, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.

KAMINS, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for second-degree assault, ORS 163.175, assigning error to the trial court's ruling denying her motion for a judgment of acquittal as to the element of physical injury. Defendant committed the assault by stabbing her landlord with a knife after he demanded unpaid rent, causing a quarter- to half-inch wide cut that was closed with glue after the victim declined stitches. Reviewing the facts in the light most favorable to the state to determine "whether any rational trier of fact *** could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt," State v. Lupoli, 348 Or. 346, 366, 234 P.3d 117 (2010), we affirm.

Defendant was also convicted of unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220, but does not challenge that conviction on appeal.

To prove that defendant committed second-degree assault, the state was required to show that she caused "physical injury to another by means of a deadly or dangerous weapon." ORS 163.175(1)(b). "Physical injury" is defined, as relevant here, as an "impairment of physical condition." ORS 161.015(7). We have "repeatedly held that cuts and gashes qualify as 'impairment of physical condition' because they disrupt the skin's function of protecting the inner body from infection." State v. Stone, 326 Or.App. 200, 207, 532 P.3d 90, adh'd to as modified on recons, 328 Or.App. 203, 536 P.3d 1094 (2023) (collecting cases). Indeed, an impairment of a physical condition can include a half-inch bleeding cut on the back of the head, State v. Hart, 222 Or.App. 285, 287, 193 P.3d 42 (2008), or a cut that bleeds alongside swelling, even if no medical attention is required, State v. Staniford, 332 Or.App. 203, 208, 548 P.3d 855 (2024). Here, defendant caused an injury that bled such that glue was used to close the wound. That injury fits squarely within the context of injuries we have determined constitute an impairment of physical condition.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Brookwell

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Sep 25, 2024
335 Or. App. 270 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)
Case details for

State v. Brookwell

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NATALIE J. BROOKWELL…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon

Date published: Sep 25, 2024

Citations

335 Or. App. 270 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)