From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brooks

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 20, 1972
269 So. 2d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-197.

November 20, 1972.

Jerry Bross, County Sol., Titusville for plaintiff.

David M. Porter, Orlando, for defendant.


The following question has been certified from the Brevard County Court of Record pursuant to Fla.App.R. 4.6, 32 F.S.A. The question is:

Does the trial and acquittal on the charge of receiving stolen property under Section 811.16, F.S. [F.S.A.], bar a subsequent trial for possession of the same property under Section 814.03(2)?

It is our view that there appears to be controlling precedent in this state on which the decision of the trial judge could be based. The trial court, under § 9, article V, of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A., (1968 revision) has the power to adjudicate the question, the answer to which may be reviewed on appeal if desired. In the exercise of its discretion this court, therefore, respectfully declines to answer the question as certified.

Spaulding v. Florida Gas Co., 249 So.2d 695 (Fla.App. 1971); Pridgeon v. Folsom, 174 So.2d 619 (Fla.App. 1965).

CROSS, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Brooks

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 20, 1972
269 So. 2d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

State v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PLAINTIFF, v. BOB OAKLAND BROOKS, DEFENDANT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 20, 1972

Citations

269 So. 2d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Iorio v. State

Miller v. Esca Rosa Development Corporation, Fla.App. 1973, 284 So.2d 227; First National Bank T. Co. v.…