State v. Brogdon

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Michael Alexander Brogdon, Appellant.

Court: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: May 9, 2012

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-282 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-282

05-09-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Michael Alexander Brogdon, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant. J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Sumter County

Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Michael Alexander Brogdon appeals his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court abused its discretion in revoking his probation because he needed drug addiction treatment rather than a prison sentence. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.